On May 7, 2025, Tier One Rankings hosted a webinar titled “Insight into How Chambers Researchers Make Ranking Decisions” with former Chambers research analysts Blessing Adeagbo and Lena Martin. They shared insider insights on how Chambers researchers assess submissions and provided practical advice on navigating the Chambers process.
The session covered how to craft compelling submissions, manage the referee process, understand what researchers look for in making ranking decisions, and increase your chances of achieving a Band 1 ranking. Whether you’re a legal marketer, a lawyer, or a firm aiming to refine your approach, this webinar was packed with expert tips and actionable strategies. We were thrilled to see such a strong turnout and to receive so many engaging questions!
Below, you will find a summary of the key topics we covered during the live session, and a link to the webinar recording.
- We began by outlining the Chambers research cycle, which includes preparation, interviews, and final rankings. Preparation involves organizing spreadsheets and scheduling interviews. During the interview phase, researchers gather feedback from lawyers and clients. Finally, researchers assess submissions, score them internally, and recommend rankings. We will soon be publishing an article that explores this topic in greater depth!
- Submissions should focus on two things: the sophistication of the work and the depth of the team. Matters must be relevant to the practice area. Structure is essential – lead with impactful, high-value matters and explain why they stand out.
- Chambers uses internal scores (1–5) to evaluate work quality, client feedback, and team strength. Scores guide decisions but don’t dictate rankings outright. Researchers consider past performance and upward or downward trajectory.
- Referee feedback is crucial – accounting for over 50% of the ranking outcome. Choose referees who are available and familiar with your work, not just senior in title. Strong feedback is often the deciding factor for rising or new lawyers.
- Team representation must be strategic. Prioritize those actively working in the practice area. Co-led matters and the “Other Team Members” section can help spotlight juniors and up-and-coming talent.
- Lawyer interviews help researchers gather market trends, team updates, and peer insights. Be constructive – avoid focusing solely on frustrations or undermining others. Use the call to build a relationship and clarify key points.
- Matter descriptions should be concise yet informative. Avoid overly technical language, but include key legal elements when helpful.
- Chambers does not currently use AI tools in its rankings. Submissions drafted with AI are acceptable, as long as the content is clear and well-written. However, referee quotes should be genuine and not AI-generated.
- There’s no fixed cap on the number of ranked lawyers from one firm, but balance is maintained across rankings. Give space to younger lawyers while continuing to support senior team members with a track record.
- Confidential-only submissions are permitted and are treated equally. The only limitation is that Chambers cannot use them for editorial purposes.
We hope these insights help refine your approach to submissions and rankings. A full Q&A article containing in-depth answers will be published soon on our website.
Click here to see the full recording of the webinar. Password: 8ctZDa$%